nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Discussion of Men's & Women's Lacrosse.
Forum rules
1. Be respectful of our online community and contribute to an engaging conversation. We reserve the right to ban impersonators and remove comments that contain personal attacks, threats, or profanity, or are flat-out offensive.
2. Stay on topic. If you feel you really have something to add that doesn’t quite fit the current topic, start a new one.
3. Keep rebuttals and disagreements impersonal. You can disagree with someone respectfully without resorting to name-calling or other insults.
4. Do not single out players for criticism by name, number or position. These are 18-23 year-old kids that are trying their best while juggling a college class load. Let’s be supportive.
5. Remember always that players read these boards; players’ families read these boards; respective recruits read these boards; opposing fans read these boards. As a GoHens.net member, YOU represent Delaware Lacrosse to others. Please do so in a positive manner.
User avatar
Cluck U
Posts: 11639
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:44 pm
UD Class: 0
Location: Blue Hen Country!

nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by Cluck U »

https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/side ... 0227032402

Technically, we had a home game against Utah, but it was moved, indoors, to Wilmington...with no fans. So, tomorrow is the team's first game in front of a home crowd at the Tub.

nova comes in with a 1-2 record having beat #7 Penn State 14-13 in OT, lost 9-11 to a solid St. Joe's team (our fellow conference member) and an 8-7 loss at #18 Rutgers. I'd be happy with nova's low 9 and 7 offensive outputs, but they did put up 14 against PSU.

Over 39 shots on goal per game...just not putting it in the net as much as they'd like. 32-40 (.444) on face offs, so we should have a shot. The wildkitties clear well (close to 91%) and their opponents have struggled a bit (56-73...that's .767), so I hope we can clean our effort up a bit of we could be in trouble.

Hens have a chance to right the ship with a good game against a good opponent.

Tomorrow's weather is a perfect Spring day: sunny, low-to-mid 50s, 5mph wind from the SW.

Free parking...tickets are inexpensive ($20...up from $15 last year)...add another $10 for Club access)). Tailgating is permitted.
Bowlin', bowlin', bowlin', keep them Blue Hens movin'...
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Posts: 12829
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:52 am
UD Class: 1991
Location: Poipu Beach, HI and outside Philly

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by bluehenbillk »

Cluck U wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2026 6:06 pm https://s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/side ... 0227032402

Technically, we had a home game against Utah, but it was moved, indoors, to Wilmington...with no fans. So, tomorrow is the team's first game in front of a home crowd at the Tub.

nova comes in with a 1-2 record having beat #7 Penn State 14-13 in OT, lost 9-11 to a solid St. Joe's team (our fellow conference member) and an 8-7 loss at #18 Rutgers. I'd be happy with nova's low 9 and 7 offensive outputs, but they did put up 14 against PSU.

Over 39 shots on goal per game...just not putting it in the net as much as they'd like. 32-40 (.444) on face offs, so we should have a shot. The wildkitties clear well (close to 91%) and their opponents have struggled a bit (56-73...that's .767), so I hope we can clean our effort up a bit of we could be in trouble.

Hens have a chance to right the ship with a good game against a good opponent.

Tomorrow's weather is a perfect Spring day: sunny, low-to-mid 50s, 5mph wind from the SW.

Free parking...tickets are inexpensive ($20...up from $15 last year)...add another $10 for Club access)). Tailgating is permitted.
You’re kinda optimistic…
UD to FBS. I never thought I’d see the day
CaliHen98
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 1:25 pm
UD Class: 1998

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by CaliHen98 »

Thank you for the preview, Cluck!
CaliHen98
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 1:25 pm
UD Class: 1998

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by CaliHen98 »

Down 5-2 after 2nd period. It appears we have been doing a better job clearing (8 of 11), but an anemic 4 total shots on goal at the half...ugghh.
CaliHen98
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2021 1:25 pm
UD Class: 1998

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by CaliHen98 »

CaliHen98 wrote: Sat Feb 28, 2026 2:00 pm Down 5-2 after 2nd period. It appears we have been doing a better job clearing (8 of 11), but an anemic 4 total shots on goal at the half...ugghh.
Correction, make that 8 of 12 clears at the half (plus 13 turnovers). We actually have more turnovers than total shot attempts (11) at this point.
WingT
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:18 pm
UD Class: 1990

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by WingT »

Gonna be a long season. I am a Deluca fan but there are some major gaps on this team.

Can we beat Nova in any sport? Jeez I can’t stand them …….
77HEN
Posts: 6144
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:18 pm
UD Class: 1981
Location: K Square, PA

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by 77HEN »

WingT wrote: Sat Feb 28, 2026 5:24 pm Gonna be a long season. I am a Deluca fan but there are some major gaps on this team.

Can we beat Nova in any sport? Jeez I can’t stand them …….
Yes, not a good year to enter the A10. I am a big Deluca fan also but something really is awry. There is big work to do in every area of the game. So glad I will be away and will miss the MD game.
User avatar
Cluck U
Posts: 11639
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:44 pm
UD Class: 0
Location: Blue Hen Country!

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by Cluck U »

Wonder what happened to Matt Montgomery?

We needed that guy's experience.

All CAA 2nd team in 2024, but missed 2025 with an injury. Said he was coming back for 2026 as a grad student and is on the roster, but has not played.

As to the game...another ugly mess. Didn't get a possession (for more than a few seconds before we'd turn it over) until 8:47 left in the first, and even that was ridiculous as our guy trying to clear ran straight into 2 defenders, lost the ball, but luckily got it back. Smart time out by DeLuca.

Clears were ugly...what is with the length of the field shots/off target passes? Silly 5-10 second possessions.

Got beat from in back of the net...yet again...with a lack of speed or lack of footwork.

Something is wrong...going straight to the fundamentals and lack of communication. I keep hearing we have talent...but it is becoming harder to see how that talent isn't translating to anything on the field.

Happy to have Maryland come to the Tub, but sheesh...not a good looking opportunity.
Bowlin', bowlin', bowlin', keep them Blue Hens movin'...
dchen
Posts: 2314
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:01 pm
UD Class: 1972
Location: Washington DC

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by dchen »

In this top 20 - UMass, St. Joes and Richmond (as #1) are all ranked. As is Maryland.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... e_vignette
LILax
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:51 pm
UD Class: 1987

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by LILax »

Matt Montgomery is back this year but obviously injured. This has forced DeLuca to start the Hens two best LSMs at close defense (Cowen and Gillin). Owen Black is also injured and not able to contribute at LSM. I am not sure why he didn't keep Gillin at LSM where he was a real asset on the wings of faceoffs and a real threat to score on clears. Makes very little sense to me. The Hens replacement LSMs have a combined 6 GBs through 4 games. That is insanely low.

I noticed that DeLuca had freshman four star Grayson Dunn (Archbishop Spaulding) out for a couple runs in the first half at LSM. He looked very fast and athletic and forced a turnover before his stick got stuck in the Nova midfielders jersey and was called for a loose ball hold.

The Hens have way too many converted attackmen running at midfield. These guys don't have to speed or ability to run past a defender. They seem uncomfortable at midfield. More suprisingly is the lack of inverts to get these traditional attackman behind the net. The lack of real midfielders is even worse now that Hank D'Ambrogi has missed his third straight game with an unknown injury. Not sure why Maverick Smith isn't getting more run at midfield. To my eye he is the fastest and most athletic midfielder with a very hard shot.

I would expect to see DeLuca mix things up this Friday against Maryland which will be more of a debacle than what we probably expected, especially with Maryland coming off THREE STRAIGHT losses. Expect a blood bath.

Lots of season left. Atlantic 10 playoffs is still in play. Just have to finish in the top 4.
WingT
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:18 pm
UD Class: 1990

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by WingT »

Looking at current rankings, it’s really impressive how fast Richmond built a powerhouse program. Wow
dchen
Posts: 2314
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:01 pm
UD Class: 1972
Location: Washington DC

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by dchen »

re Richmond: I wonder how they can do that versus our progression:

1. we're in the same conference
2. We are probably both expensive to out of state recruits, if not on scholie
3. Maybe they have better NIL.

I also wonder how the House settlement effects our recruiting. Are we expanding from the 11+ NCAA limit to the 48 now allowed?
BlueHenBill
Posts: 9813
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:30 am

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by BlueHenBill »

dchen wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 4:18 pm re Richmond: I wonder how they can do that versus our progression:

1. we're in the same conference
2. We are probably both expensive to out of state recruits, if not on scholie
3. Maybe they have better NIL.

I also wonder how the House settlement effects our recruiting. Are we expanding from the 11+ NCAA limit to the 48 now allowed?
Private colleges have an advantage over public colleges in Lax recruiting ue to the preppy nature of the sport. The rankings usually reflect thsi advantage strongly. There are exceptions with so-called public Ivies like UNC. This is why many programs that didn't have Lax for decades after UD's first Men's lax team in 1948 have passed UD's program. See Nova & St. Joe's for just two examples.
LILax
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:51 pm
UD Class: 1987

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by LILax »

BlueHenBill wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:18 pm
dchen wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 4:18 pm re Richmond: I wonder how they can do that versus our progression:

1. we're in the same conference
2. We are probably both expensive to out of state recruits, if not on scholie
3. Maybe they have better NIL.

I also wonder how the House settlement effects our recruiting. Are we expanding from the 11+ NCAA limit to the 48 now allowed?
Private colleges have an advantage over public colleges in Lax recruiting ue to the preppy nature of the sport. The rankings usually reflect thsi advantage strongly. There are exceptions with so-called public Ivies like UNC. This is why many programs that didn't have Lax for decades after UD's first Men's lax team in 1948 have passed UD's program. See Nova & St. Joe's for just two examples.
How many NCAA tourney wins do Nova and St. Joe's have? Nova has made the NCAA tourney three times (2009, 2011, 2018) ZERO wins.
St. Joes has made the NCAA tourney twice 2022 and 2024 and lost both times. Delaware has beaten St. Joes 17 out of 21 times they have played, including 4 of the last 5 they have played since 2017. So two down years for Delaware and these two programs have passed UD?
dchen
Posts: 2314
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:01 pm
UD Class: 1972
Location: Washington DC

Re: nova - Home, "opener" Saturday, Feb 28, 1pm

Post by dchen »

BlueHenBill wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 7:18 pm
dchen wrote: Tue Mar 03, 2026 4:18 pm re Richmond: I wonder how they can do that versus our progression:

1. we're in the same conference
2. We are probably both expensive to out of state recruits, if not on scholie
3. Maybe they have better NIL.

I also wonder how the House settlement effects our recruiting. Are we expanding from the 11+ NCAA limit to the 48 now allowed?
Private colleges have an advantage over public colleges in Lax recruiting ue to the preppy nature of the sport. The rankings usually reflect thsi advantage strongly. There are exceptions with so-called public Ivies like UNC. This is why many programs that didn't have Lax for decades after UD's first Men's lax team in 1948 have passed UD's program. See Nova & St. Joe's for just two examples.
Of the 80 or so D1 MLAX Programs, only about 20 or so are public.
Post Reply